scotus
backlog row · status candidate · domain DATA (Data engines, reference source) · lane A · refresh pinned · tags US · LAW · DATA-ENGINES
What an agent uses it for
US Supreme Court slip opinions 2019-2025 terms (449 cases, 1,158 files): holdings and separate opinions verbatim
Use it
xerj corpus add --from https://raw.githubusercontent.com/xerj-org/xerj/corpus-hub/tools/xerj-code/hub/scotus.jsonxerj corpus index scotus then xerj code scotus "your question"Sources and pins
| source | pin | licence | size | review note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/xerj-org/corpus-scotus-v2 | recipe | ? | curated pack | US public domain (17 USC 105; case law uncopyrightable, Wheaton v. Peters 1834). v2 mirror @1fbb81b6: supremecourt.gov slip PDFs re-split into 4,523 paragraph-granular part files (mean 6.7KB); byte-exact reassembly verified for all 1,158 parents (20/20 sha256). Round-2 suite g7-scotus-round2-2026-10.json registered before round-2 retrieval. |
0 B across 0 files. Added n/a.
Rights
?. See per-source review blocks. The review block records a human opening each licence file at the pin. Detector output is a hint, never the verdict.
Retrieval spot-check (G7)
2.0/5 relevant. Graded .
Q: did Dobbs overrule Roe v Wade
expect: corpus-scotus-v2/opinions/2021/19-1392-dobbs-v-jackson-women-s-health-organization-p004.txt
top-5:
grade: irrelevant
expect: corpus-scotus-v2/opinions/2021/19-1392-dobbs-v-jackson-women-s-health-organization-p004.txt
top-5:
grade: irrelevant
Q: what happened to Chevron deference in Loper Bright
expect: corpus-scotus-v2/opinions/2023/22-451-loper-bright-enterprises-v-raimondo-p011.txt
top-5:
grade: irrelevant
expect: corpus-scotus-v2/opinions/2023/22-451-loper-bright-enterprises-v-raimondo-p011.txt
top-5:
grade: irrelevant
Q: what did the district court find about UNC admissions under the Equal Protection Clause
expect: corpus-scotus-v2/opinions/2022/20-1199-students-for-fair-admissions-inc-v-president-and-fellows-of--p003.txt
top-5:
grade: relevant
expect: corpus-scotus-v2/opinions/2022/20-1199-students-for-fair-admissions-inc-v-president-and-fellows-of--p003.txt
top-5:
grade: relevant
Q: what individual right does the Second Amendment guarantee under Bruen
expect: corpus-scotus-v2/opinions/2021/20-843-new-york-state-rifle-pistol-assn-inc-v-bruen-p008.txt
top-5:
grade: relevant
expect: corpus-scotus-v2/opinions/2021/20-843-new-york-state-rifle-pistol-assn-inc-v-bruen-p008.txt
top-5:
grade: relevant
Q: what did Justice Sotomayor's dissent say the SFFA Court did
expect: corpus-scotus-v2/opinions/2022/20-1199-students-for-fair-admissions-inc-v-president-and-fellows-of--sotomayor-dissenting-p001.txt
top-5:
grade: irrelevant
expect: corpus-scotus-v2/opinions/2022/20-1199-students-for-fair-admissions-inc-v-president-and-fellows-of--sotomayor-dissenting-p001.txt
top-5:
grade: irrelevant